Saturday, August 28, 2004

9/11 Research Sources

The following article contains links to documents for use in the research and investigation of unanswered questions regarding the events of 9/11. Do not be mistaken, the 9/11 Commission report has left most serious questions unanswered or simply not addressed. Do your own investigation and if you come to your own conclusions and appreciate the magnitude of this issue help spread the truth. Read more…

For a valuable starting point including a long list of serious questions go to the website for the Family Steering Committee. These are questions unanswered by, and created for the administration from a large group of family members of those killed on 9/11: Questions!

This list of research sources, and this blog overall, will be updated frequently with information and resources regarding the motives and potential complicity of the Bush administration in the tragedy that was 9/11. If you have additional resources that you believe may be valuable in this investigation please make them through the comments link at the bottom of each article and I will report them, or incorporate them into this resource sheet. If you are not concerned about anonymity please send me any info via my email Send 9/11 Info!

Let me know if you would like me to add you to an email list and I will inform you of updates to the 9/11 Research Sources document online.

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 is a carefully researched, surprisingly balanced new book by professor David Ray Griffin of the Claremont School of Theology. The text can now be accessed free at:
Spread this around! (The book ought to be bought, too.)

Search the final report of the 9/11 Commission in its entirety:

Website for the Family Steering Committee contains excellent list of questions submitted to the 9/11 Commission: questions main site

A research site set up by to further the advancement of 9/11 investigations. Lot of valuable files and links. Includes well organized reading room w/ links to many articles and the Summer of Truth Campaign. See their 9/11 Omissions Dossier for an online effort to unite research with activism: reading room summer of truth main site Omissions Dossier

Info about Ellen Mariani, widow of a 9/11 victim who has filed a RICO Act suit against the Bush administration. Includes link to petition also listed under petitions below and her amended complaint:
Ellen Mariani vs Bush administration text

Paul Thompsons Extensive 9/11 Timeline: timeline main site

Crucial investigations and timelines of 9/11 from Michael C. Ruppert timeline main site

Extensive articles on 9/11 from many writers including Michel Chossudovsky key articles main site

International Inquiry into 9/11 and marketing campaign. The Inquiry Dollar in particular is a great piece of media to hand out (it looks like a dollar bill with info about 9/11 and websites to visit: 9/11 inquiry

Radio shows and links to action groups around the nation concerning 9/11. Includes well organized forum: forums main site

Valuable collection of a variety of articles concerning 9/11. Affiliated with 9/11 Meetup. Includes 9/11 Widows response to Washington Post and 9/11 Family Steering Committee: Questions for Bush. Really helpful site:

9/11 research with many resources:

Downloadable and streamable video of speakers from the "1st International Citizen's Inquiry into 9/11" held in SF in March of 04:

International 9/11 Questions Meetup Day:

Transcripts and Police Reports from 9/11 as well as the 5-minute video of George W. Bush on the morning of 9/11. Many other valuable documents:.

Current Petitions for a new, independent investigation into 9/11
investigate oddities petition
investigate and impeach
911 for the truth

How did the media handle 9/11? Read specifically about NBC news coverage on 9/11 including methods of spin and serious credible reports of WTC explosions later uninvestigated:
NBC Spins 911 text

"Graphic design and multimedia for effecting change" includes 9/11 investigative videos: videos

International Citizens Inquiry Into 9/11 includes text from key speakers at conference in Toronto during May 04:

German Engineers use photos to analyze destruction of WTC amongst other things:
german engineers WTC

Broad site on globalization and administration activities with focus on 9/11:

Local Portland Oregon organization The Portland 9-11 Truth Alliance:
the portland 9-11 truth alliance email

Can high-powered controversial images mesmerize skeptics of complicity, long enough to make an imprint and possibly redirect their skepticism towards the official story of 9/11? I don't have the answer, however in an attempt to find out, I've made available a series of hi-resolution images that express administration complicity as provocatively as possible. Some may consider these to be merely partisan and extremely inflammatory, but I feel very passionately about the issue of complicity. In reference to an example of politically provocative marketing, I would like to make reference to the broadcast commercial made by the DDB agency in 1964 for Lyndon Johnson, where "a child playing with a daisy fades into a mechanical sounding adult voice counting down to nuclear destruction." DDB set out to create a commercial that would avoid focusing strictly on the competition between LBJ and his opponent Barry Goldwater, but to case the election, in the words of "Culture of Cool" author Thomas Frank, "as an expression of the archetypal cultural conflict of the day. Its stark division of the world into flower-child and technocratic death count couldn't have caught the mood of the nation more accurate or more presciently." Although I'm not claiming that these images will have the same effect (and I must express that I wouldn't have marketed for LBJ), I think they are valuable as an expression of how an image can tell a story, albeit an unpleasant story, and possibly work their way into the public conciousness. Yes, these images may be considered extreme or inflammatory, but how truly inflammatory is a mere image when compared to the ruthless and very real incendiary actions of the Bush Administration? Go here if so inclined, and good luck to you:
Expose The Truth!

More to come. I will be updating this often. Please spread this wildly!

If you'd like an email version of the above list, with the original addresses and links, please request one via the comments link below the article.


Ron Gassaway


GARY HART – Former Senator

"In terms of accountability, I think this is one of the great mysteries of the last three or four years. Three thousand Americans died three years ago, and no one lost his or her job over it. A president who says that he is a strong president, and those around him say he is, did not fire anyone. Either he was misled, in which case, somebody should have been fired. Or he misled us, in which case he should be fired."

ED ASNER - Actor and Activist

"I fear that if the underlying issues of 9-11 truth are not demanded, that Iraq may be but a flame on an ocean of gasoline that may be used to ignite war after war after war. We cannot, as a peace & justice movement only address the flames. We must look at the fuel being used to justify the flames of war and repression at home and abroad.

We must look deeply at the events leading up to, on and since 9-11. We must demand full 9-11 truth."

HOWARD ZINN – Author and Historian

"Whether one views the 9/11 'terrorist' attacks as blowback, a wake-up call, or an unjustified outrage, they have deeply affected the American psyche and our attitudes toward war, the future, and the world. . . . After 9/11, this administration systematically nurtured the fear of further homeland attacks to justify its own assaults on constitutional rights as well as social and environmental programs that protected "the people" but fettered corporate power and control. . . . Democracy requires citizen vigilance, informed debate and official accountability."


“We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta.”

'astonished military experts cannot fathom why the government's "automatic standard order of procedure in the event of a hijacking" was not followed'

“It is interesting how often in our history, when disaster strikes, incompetence is considered a better alibi than .... Well, yes, there are worse things.”


I myself feel that our country, for whose Constitution I fought in a just war, might as well have been invaded by Martians and body snatchers. Sometimes I wish it had been. What has happened, though, is that it has been taken over by means of the sleaziest, low-comedy, Keystone Cops-style coup d’etat imaginable”

RICHARD CLARKE - Top White House Terrorism Advisor during 9/11

“Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism,” says Clarke in Sunday’s interview. “He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. Maybe. We’ll never know.”

Rumsfeld was saying we needed to bomb Iraq….We all said, ‘but no, no. Al Qaeda is in Afghanistan,” recounts Clarke, “and Rumsfeld said, ‘There aren’t any good targets in Afghanistan and there are lots of good targets in Iraq.’ I said, ‘Well, there are lots of good targets in lots of places, but Iraq had nothing to do with [the September 11 attacks].’”

ROBERT WRIGHT - FBI agent tracking terrorist cell in Chicago 98/01

Internal FBI memo June 2001 ‘the FBI, rather than trying to prevent a terrorist attack, "was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest when a terrorist attack occurred."

MARK FLESSNER - Chicago federal prosecutor on above case

‘evidently thought that something other than incompetence was involved, saying that there "were powers bigger than I was in the Justice Department and within the FBI that simply were not going to let [the building of a criminal case] happen."

GEORGE TENET - CIA Director: Intelligence Summary on June 28 2001

"It is highly likely that a significant al-Qadea attack is in the near future, within several weeks."


Title: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”

“FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.”


Post a Comment

<< Home